Katharine Ann Fletcher
A Systematic Review of equid welfare at slaughter: existing evidence and evaluation of animal welfare indicators
Fletcher, Katharine Ann; Limon, Georgina; Whatford, Louise; Grist, Andy; Knowles, Toby; Gibson, Troy
Authors
Georgina Limon
Louise Whatford
Andy Grist
Toby Knowles
Troy Gibson
Abstract
Guidance surrounding equine slaughter varies globally and lacks published evidence, limiting practical application, causing industry confusion and potentially compromised welfare. Existing research in this field was systematically reviewed, with gaps in the literature assessed and welfare indicators evaluated for feasibility in a commercial setting. Four databases were searched: PubMed, CAB Abstracts, Science Direct and Google Scholar, using a combination of different search terms. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied with full articles assessed for reliability, repeatability, potential bias and study design. Each welfare indicator was assessed on feasibility for slaughterhouse observations and level of invasiveness. In total, 2,194 articles were screened, and an additional 35 articles were identified via peer-networks and after a snowball search of reference lists. After screening, 105 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. Of these, 101 (96%) were peer-reviewed journal articles and 4 (4%) were grey literature. Thirty-two (30%) looked at equid slaughter specifically with conflicting findings regarding slaughter efficacy, but overall agreement on horses showing stress-related behaviour prior to slaughter. Most studies (n=76, 72%) were conducted in High-Income Countries and not countries where equid slaughter is most prolific. Welfare indicators were identified with deemed feasible for use as non-invasive or pathological measures in a commercial slaughterhouse. In conclusion, this review found a shortage of published research assessing equid welfare at slaughter, particularly donkeys and in low-income countries, highlighting the need to urgently develop an evidence base for improving guidance in this area.
Citation
Fletcher, K. A., Limon, G., Whatford, L., Grist, A., Knowles, T., & Gibson, T. (2022). A Systematic Review of equid welfare at slaughter: existing evidence and evaluation of animal welfare indicators. Livestock Science, 263, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104988
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 12, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 13, 2022 |
Publication Date | Jun 13, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Nov 25, 2021 |
Journal | Livestock Science |
Print ISSN | 1871-1413 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 263 |
Article Number | 104988 |
Pages | 1-9 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104988 |
Keywords | Animal Welfare; Equine; Slaughter; Systematic Review; Welfare Indicators |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141322001676 |
You might also like
Animal Health and Welfare Pathway (AHWP)
(2024)
Report
Environmental Land Management scheme (ELMs)
(2024)
Report
Downloadable Citations
About RVC Repository
Administrator e-mail: publicationsrepos@rvc.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search