Diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates samples from the canine liver and spleen is not significantly affected by using 22-, 23-, and 25-gauge needles

Llanos, C; Holmes, E; White, C; Jasensky, AK; Fitzgerald, E

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of the liver and spleen for cytological analysis are a commonly performed procedure in canine veterinary practice. Based on our review of the literature, this is the first published study investigating whether needle size affects the diagnostic quality of hepatic and splenic samples. The aim of this prospective analytical study was to compare the diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided FNA cytological samples of canine liver and spleen based on cellularity, blood contamination, and overall cell preservation between three different needle sizes (22-, 23-, and 25-gauge). A total of 282 splenic aspirates from 94 dogs and 348 hepatic aspirates from 116 dogs were enrolled in the study and examined by two board-certified veterinary clinical pathologists. In this study, no significant differences in diagnostic quality were identified between different needle gauge sizes when sampling canine liver and spleen. Blood contamination was higher using 22-gauge needles compared with 25-gauge needles (P = 0.024) when sampling the liver.

Citation

Llanos, C., Holmes, E., White, C., Jasensky, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2023). Diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates samples from the canine liver and spleen is not significantly affected by using 22-, 23-, and 25-gauge needles. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13290

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jul 26, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Aug 7, 2023
• Publication Date: 2023
• Deposit Date: Aug 14, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Aug 14, 2023
• Journal: Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound
• Print ISSN: 1058-8183
• Electronic ISSN: 1740-8261
• Publisher: Wiley
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13290
• Keywords: cytology; dog; fine needle aspiration; sampling; BIOPSY; LESIONS; CYTOLOGY; SAFETY; ORGANS; RISK; CELL