Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates samples from the canine liver and spleen is not significantly affected by using 22-, 23-, and 25-gauge needles

Llanos, C; Holmes, E; White, C; Jasensky, AK; Fitzgerald, E

Authors

C Llanos

E Holmes

C White

AK Jasensky

E Fitzgerald



Abstract

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of the liver and spleen for cytological analysis are a commonly performed procedure in canine veterinary practice. Based on our review of the literature, this is the first published study investigating whether needle size affects the diagnostic quality of hepatic and splenic samples. The aim of this prospective analytical study was to compare the diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided FNA cytological samples of canine liver and spleen based on cellularity, blood contamination, and overall cell preservation between three different needle sizes (22-, 23-, and 25-gauge). A total of 282 splenic aspirates from 94 dogs and 348 hepatic aspirates from 116 dogs were enrolled in the study and examined by two board-certified veterinary clinical pathologists. In this study, no significant differences in diagnostic quality were identified between different needle gauge sizes when sampling canine liver and spleen. Blood contamination was higher using 22-gauge needles compared with 25-gauge needles (P = 0.024) when sampling the liver.

Citation

Llanos, C., Holmes, E., White, C., Jasensky, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2023). Diagnostic quality of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates samples from the canine liver and spleen is not significantly affected by using 22-, 23-, and 25-gauge needles. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13290

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 26, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 7, 2023
Publication Date 2023
Deposit Date Aug 14, 2023
Publicly Available Date Aug 14, 2023
Print ISSN 1058-8183
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13290
Keywords cytology; dog; fine needle aspiration; sampling; BIOPSY; LESIONS; CYTOLOGY; SAFETY; ORGANS; RISK; CELL

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations