Emma Norris
Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices
Norris, Emma; Clark, Kait; Munafò, Marcus; Jay, Caroline; Baldwin, Jessie; Lautarescu, Alexandra; Pedder, Hugo; Page, Mike; Rinke, Eike Mark; Burn, Charlotte; Cawthorn, William; Ballou, Nick; Glover, Scott; Evans, Samuel; Rossit, Stephanie; Soltanlou, Mojtaba; Wise, Emma; Kelson, Mark; Soliman, Nadia; Jones, Andrew J; Costello, Rianne; Smailes, David; Wilkinson, Laura; Piccardi, Elena Serena; Partridge, Adam; Hulme, Charlotte; Schultze, Anna; Pennington, Charlotte
Authors
Kait Clark
Marcus Munafò
Caroline Jay
Jessie Baldwin
Alexandra Lautarescu
Hugo Pedder
Mike Page
Eike Mark Rinke
Charlotte Burn
William Cawthorn
Nick Ballou
Scott Glover
Samuel Evans
Stephanie Rossit
Mojtaba Soltanlou
Emma Wise
Mark Kelson
Nadia Soliman
Andrew J Jones
Rianne Costello
David Smailes
Laura Wilkinson
Elena Serena Piccardi
Adam Partridge
Charlotte Hulme
Anna Schultze
Charlotte Pennington
Abstract
Objectives: Whilst the need for Open Research practices is well documented, there remains a lack of validated questionnaires to assess their prevalence. This study validated the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure Open Research awareness and uptake.
Methods: The survey was developed in six steps: 1) a scoping exercise collated previous questionnaires on Open Research, 2) a brief (<5 minutes) questionnaire was developed, 3) peer-reviewed, 4) piloted, 5) revised, and 6) the final questionnaire was distributed to researchers across universities in the UK Reproducibility Network.
Results: Respondents (n = 1,274) reported being most aware of Open Access Publications (94.1%), Preprints (85.3%), and Open Data (83.4%) and least aware of Registered Reports (38.1%), Study Preregistration (50.8%) and Research Co-production (53.7%). They reported having mostly used Open Access Publications (77.8%), Preprints (56.5%) and Open Data (52.5%) and having least used Registered Reports (8.7%), Replication Studies (16.3%), and Study Preregistration (25.3%). The most commonly reported areas of support required to enable Open Research were incentives (51%), dedicated funding (46.2%), and recognition in promotion and recruitment criteria (39.6%).
Conclusion: We developed the Brief Open Research Survey that can be used to assess prevalence of Open Research practices and track uptake of these over time.
Citation
Norris, E., Clark, K., Munafò, M., Jay, C., Baldwin, J., Lautarescu, A., Pedder, H., Page, M., Rinke, E. M., Burn, C., Cawthorn, W., Ballou, N., Glover, S., Evans, S., Rossit, S., Soltanlou, M., Wise, E., Kelson, M., Soliman, N., Jones, A. J., …Pennington, C. Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices
Working Paper Type | Preprint |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jun 8, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jan 16, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 16, 2025 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/w48yh |
Keywords | Open Research, Open Science, meta research, transparency, UK Reproducibility Network, responsible research practices |
Files
Preprint April 2024
(931 Kb)
PDF
Version
preprint
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About RVC Repository
Administrator e-mail: publicationsrepos@rvc.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search