Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices

Norris, Emma; Clark, Kait; Munafò, Marcus; Jay, Caroline; Baldwin, Jessie; Lautarescu, Alexandra; Pedder, Hugo; Page, Mike; Rinke, Eike Mark; Burn, Charlotte; Cawthorn, William; Ballou, Nick; Glover, Scott; Evans, Samuel; Rossit, Stephanie; Soltanlou, Mojtaba; Wise, Emma; Kelson, Mark; Soliman, Nadia; Jones, Andrew J; Costello, Rianne; Smailes, David; Wilkinson, Laura; Piccardi, Elena Serena; Partridge, Adam; Hulme, Charlotte; Schultze, Anna; Pennington, Charlotte

Authors

Emma Norris

Kait Clark

Marcus Munafò

Caroline Jay

Jessie Baldwin

Alexandra Lautarescu

Hugo Pedder

Mike Page

Eike Mark Rinke

Charlotte Burn

William Cawthorn

Nick Ballou

Scott Glover

Samuel Evans

Stephanie Rossit

Mojtaba Soltanlou

Emma Wise

Mark Kelson

Nadia Soliman

Andrew J Jones

Rianne Costello

David Smailes

Laura Wilkinson

Elena Serena Piccardi

Adam Partridge

Charlotte Hulme

Anna Schultze

Charlotte Pennington



Abstract

Objectives: Whilst the need for Open Research practices is well documented, there remains a lack of validated questionnaires to assess their prevalence. This study validated the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure Open Research awareness and uptake.
Methods: The survey was developed in six steps: 1) a scoping exercise collated previous questionnaires on Open Research, 2) a brief (<5 minutes) questionnaire was developed, 3) peer-reviewed, 4) piloted, 5) revised, and 6) the final questionnaire was distributed to researchers across universities in the UK Reproducibility Network.
Results: Respondents (n = 1,274) reported being most aware of Open Access Publications (94.1%), Preprints (85.3%), and Open Data (83.4%) and least aware of Registered Reports (38.1%), Study Preregistration (50.8%) and Research Co-production (53.7%). They reported having mostly used Open Access Publications (77.8%), Preprints (56.5%) and Open Data (52.5%) and having least used Registered Reports (8.7%), Replication Studies (16.3%), and Study Preregistration (25.3%). The most commonly reported areas of support required to enable Open Research were incentives (51%), dedicated funding (46.2%), and recognition in promotion and recruitment criteria (39.6%).
Conclusion: We developed the Brief Open Research Survey that can be used to assess prevalence of Open Research practices and track uptake of these over time.

Citation

Norris, E., Clark, K., Munafò, M., Jay, C., Baldwin, J., Lautarescu, A., Pedder, H., Page, M., Rinke, E. M., Burn, C., Cawthorn, W., Ballou, N., Glover, S., Evans, S., Rossit, S., Soltanlou, M., Wise, E., Kelson, M., Soliman, N., Jones, A. J., …Pennington, C. Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices

Working Paper Type Preprint
Online Publication Date Jun 8, 2022
Deposit Date Jan 16, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jan 16, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/w48yh
Keywords Open Research, Open Science, meta research, transparency, UK Reproducibility Network, responsible research practices

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations