Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study

Hawkes, C; Morris, J; Bavcar, S; Wilkie, C; Ray, S; Auquier, C; Benjamin, S; Masso, JB; Bottin, S; Davies, O; Desmas-Bazelle, I; Einhorn, A; Figueroa-Gonzalez, C; Holenova, K; Kritsotalaki, E; Peak, K; Smallwood, K; Treggiari, E; Valenti, P; de la Virgen, MG; Fournier, Q

Authors

C Hawkes

J Morris

S Bavcar

C Wilkie

S Ray

C Auquier

S Benjamin

JB Masso

S Bottin

O Davies

I Desmas-Bazelle

A Einhorn

C Figueroa-Gonzalez

K Holenova

E Kritsotalaki

K Peak

K Smallwood

E Treggiari

P Valenti

MG de la Virgen

Q Fournier



Abstract

BackgroundPeripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared. ObjectivesOur primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes. AnimalsFive hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25. MethodsRetrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021. ResultsThe 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols. Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceOur study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.

Citation

Hawkes, C., Morris, J., Bavcar, S., Wilkie, C., Ray, S., Auquier, C., Benjamin, S., Masso, J., Bottin, S., Davies, O., Desmas-Bazelle, I., Einhorn, A., Figueroa-Gonzalez, C., Holenova, K., Kritsotalaki, E., Peak, K., Smallwood, K., Treggiari, E., Valenti, P., de la Virgen, M., & Fournier, Q. (2024). Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 1, 2024
Online Publication Date Oct 18, 2024
Publication Date 2024
Deposit Date Nov 14, 2024
Publicly Available Date Nov 14, 2024
Journal Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Print ISSN 0891-6640
Electronic ISSN 1939-1676
Publisher Wiley Open Access
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222
Keywords canine; CHOP-19; CHOP-25; lymphoma; progression-free survival; CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOL; REMISSION DURATION; DOSE INTENSITY; CANINE; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATION; 15-WEEK; IMPACT; TIME

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations