EM Esievo
One Health conceptualization of sustainable diets looking at low- and middle-income settings: a systematic literature review
Esievo, EM; Whatford, L; Espinosa, SN; Awulu, OA; Ahmed, AN; Murray, KA; Ali, Z
Authors
L Whatford
SN Espinosa
OA Awulu
AN Ahmed
KA Murray
Z Ali
Abstract
Unhealthy diets are proven risks for non-communicable diseases and mortality globally. Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are equally faced with food/nutrition insecurity, poor health outcomes, and the need for sustainable food systems transformation to cater for the growing population within safe planetary boundaries. Despite significant progress globally, persistent challenges necessitate a more holistic and systemic approach to healthy sustainable diets, particularly in LMICs which are often underrepresented in global studies. This review conceptualizes sustainable diets looking at LMICs by assessing sustainability through the One Health approach which considers the interdependencies among humans, animals, plants, and the environment. Using the preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the checklist for One Health epidemiological reporting of evidence (COHERE) standards, four databases were searched (Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, and Scopus) between 1947 and June 2023. Dietary sustainability was assessed in LMICs by evaluating coverage across the four One Health pillars (human, animal, plant, and environmental health) and five dietary sustainability dimensions (diet/nutrition, health, environment, economic, and social). Extracted data were analyzed qualitatively. The database searches yielded 3,122 studies. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 35 studies were selected for inclusion. Most studies were from upper (77%) and lower (20%) middle-income countries. While 20 studies (57%) assessed human and environmental health, none assessed plant or animal health, nor all four One Health pillars combined. No study assessed all five dietary sustainability dimensions. Most studies assessed two (54%) or three (34%) dimensions, and the most frequently assessed dimension was the environment (71%). Thus, highlighting the non-comprehensive nature and the dearth of research on sustainable diets conducted in LMICs, particularly, low-income countries, and that the research so far mainly focuses on environmental impacts. Overall, studies found that LMICs' diets, particularly middle-income countries, are unsustainable due to low quality, low diversity, and high environmental effects, with associated inequities. The underrepresentation of LMICs, particularly low-income countries, in this review is a wake-up call urging the generation of more country-specific data incorporating more dietary sustainability dimensions and One Health pillars (especially plant and animal health) for progress and monitoring toward attaining global dietary sustainability.
Citation
Esievo, E., Whatford, L., Espinosa, S., Awulu, O., Ahmed, A., Murray, K., & Ali, Z. (2025). One Health conceptualization of sustainable diets looking at low- and middle-income settings: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1567245
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 30, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | May 16, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jun 11, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 11, 2025 |
Print ISSN | 2571-581X |
Electronic ISSN | 2571-581X |
Publisher | Frontiers Media |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 9 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1567245 |
Keywords | One Health; sustainable diets; low- and middle-income countries; food system; dietary; sustainability; NUTRITION |
Files
One Health Conceptualization Of Sustainable Diets Looking At Low- And Middle-income Settings: A Systematic Literature Review
(899 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Version
VoR
You might also like
Animal Health and Welfare Pathway (AHWP)
(2024)
Report
Environmental Land Management scheme (ELMs)
(2024)
Report
Review: The challenge to integrate animal welfare indicators into the Life Cycle Assessment
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About RVC Repository
Administrator e-mail: publicationsrepos@rvc.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search